HIIT: What We've Known All Along
So here's an article from Maria Cheng of the Associated Press on the superiority of HIIT to steady state cardio:
People who complain they have no time to exercise may soon need another excuse.
Some experts say intense exercise sessions could help people squeeze an entire week’s workout into less than an hour. Intense exercise regimens, or interval training, was originally developed for Olympic athletes and thought to be too strenuous for normal people.
But in recent years, studies in older people and those with health problems suggest many more people might be able to handle it. If true, that could revolutionize how officials advise people to exercise — and save millions of people hours in the gym every week. It is also a smarter way to exercise, experts say.
“High-intensity interval training is twice as effective as normal exercise,” said Jan Helgerud, an exercise expert at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology. “This is like finding a new pill that works twice as well … we should immediately throw out the old way of exercising.”
Intense interval training means working very hard for a few minutes, with rest periods in between sets. Experts have mostly tested people running or biking, but other sports like rowing or swimming should also work.
Helgerud recommends people try four sessions lasting four minutes each, with three minutes of recovery time in between. Unless you’re an elite athlete, it shouldn’t be an all-out effort.
“You should be a little out of breath, but you shouldn’t have the obvious feeling of exhaustion,” Helgerud said.
In Britain and the U.S., officials recommend that people get about two and a half hours each week of moderate exercise.
Helgerud says that time could be slashed dramatically if people did interval training instead. He said officials have been too afraid of recommending intense training, fearing it might be too much for some people.
“I’m much more afraid of people not exercising at all,” he said. “Inactivity is what’s killing us.”
When compared to people on a normal exercise routine, like jogging, research has shown those doing interval training can double their endurance, improve their oxygen use and strength by more than 10 percent, and their speed by at least 5 percent. Even studies in the elderly and in heart patients found they had better oxygen use and fitness after doing interval training.
Still, most studies have been done in young, healthy adults, and experts advise people to consult a doctor before starting any fitness program.
For Adamson Nicholls, a 36-year-old Londoner and martial arts enthusiast, interval training is a way to boost his endurance so he can outlast sparring opponents. “It’s a shortcut to explosive fitness,” he said, adding the training results in snappier and heavier punches.
Using interval training, Nicholls got into top shape last year in about six weeks, using weekly 45-minute sessions. He estimates the same level would have taken about three months via regular training.
Experts say that’s because intense bursts of activity are precisely what the body needs to build stronger muscles. Traditional workouts lasting an hour or more simply don’t push the body enough.
“A lot of the (benefits) from exercise are due to a stress response,” said Stephen Bailey, a sports sciences expert at the University of Exeter. “If you disturb your muscles, there’s an imbalance created and your body will start signaling pathways that result in adjustments.”
Bailey said intense bursts of exercise help the body to convert one type of muscle fiber into another type that uses oxygen more efficiently and is capable of exercising a lot longer. Even though interval training only takes a few minutes, its effects last for hours.
“You’ve exercised at such a high intensity that you’re going to create a massive disturbance in your muscles,” Bailey said. That creates a higher metabolism for several hours afterward, which the body will bring down by burning fat and carbohydrates.
Helgerud and others predicted that as further studies confirm interval training is safe for wider populations, authorities will include it in their exercise guidelines.
“This is definitely the way forward to save time on your exercise,” Nicholls said. “The results are worth it.”
I find absolutely frustrating that people find this to be news. It's like when they have news stories every once in awhile about how you should drink lots of water or eat your fruits and vegetables: no sh!t Sherlock!
News is supposed to be new information. Bodybuilders, trainers, athletes and martial artists have known this information for decades. It's not about the amount of work you do, it's about the amount you do within a given period of time. So the more work you can pack per unit of time, the better.
Your body is meant to execute bursts of physical activity, then back off. It was meant for combat and hunting, not long distance running. Jogging, by definition, is HALF-ASS EFFORT. Why waste your time doing things half-ass?
This concept of doing more work in less time is not exclusive to cardio. You can do this in weight training as well. Neo-Classical Bodybuilding goes over in great detail how to train more efficiently, how to pack more work per unit of time (density phases), then backing off (decompression).
Most newbies do everything but train efficiently. Instead of focusing on a single exercise per body part and keeping their workouts short and sweet, they include every damn exercise and prolong their workouts to an hour and a half to two hours. That is more work but in more time.
And instead of working each body part more frequently and packing in more workouts per unit of time (a week), newbies choose 4-way split routines and hit each body part less frequently. In the scope of a week, they do less work per unit of time.
And yet somehow, people cling to this idea that bashing each body part through multiple exercises once every 4-7 days is the best way to go. That strategy is the antithesis of training efficiency.
Newbies: do yourself a favor and train briefly, intensely and frequently. You'll make much better progress training this way.
Comments
Experienced lifters, however, are better suited to training a body part once or twice a week. They've already acquired enough muscle mass to be maintained on a low frequency of training.
Not only this but they can tap into their fast-twitch muscle fibers much more easily than newbies. Tapping into high threshold fibers requires more rests and allows you to maintain size on a low frequency training program.
This is the crux of my upcoming book, which shows you how train on a low frequency program.
Newbies don't have the muscle mass to maintain on a low frequency program, nor have they innervated the muscles enough to sustain growth across the time gap of a week.
It's kind of like when a beginning pianist needs to practice much more frequently in the beginning to know all the notes and develop those neural connections. After you've become an expert pianist, however, you can lay off after awhile. You can come back to playing and it would take you too long to get back into the swing of things.
Nevertheless, I think even experienced lifters can benefit from more frequent lifting IF they used a hybrid split/whole body routine like the one in Strength and Physique Volume One.